Ajmer Dargah Spiritual Leader Applauds Progress Under PM Modi, Says ‘The country has been progressing in…’

PM Modi

PM Modi: There are Lok Sabha elections 2024 taking place across the nation. The BJP-led central government is being accused by the INDI block, however, of altering the nation’s constitution in the event that it wins election a third time.

Addressing National Confusion

Syed Zainul Abedin Ali Khan, the Diwan and spiritual leader of Ajmer Dargah Sharif, made a significant declaration in this episode. He claimed that the nation is experiencing fake confusion. It is a different story when the Constitution is amended. This has nothing to do with amending the Constitution. In addition, he has spoken out about Ram Mandir and the Citizenship Amendment Act.

Historical Perspective on Constitution Amendments

“The Constitution,” according to Ali Khan, “was drafted in 1950. Since then, how many amendments have been made in Parliament? We shall make any necessary modifications if doing so serves the public and national interests. However, the opposition is causing misleading uncertainty throughout the nation. Did Indira Gandhi not make any amendments in 1975 when the Emergency was declared? There is no connection between amending the Constitution and altering it.”

Syed Zainul also complimented the central government, which is led by the Bharatiya Janata Party, stating that “the country has advanced over the past ten years and that the current government is responsible for the country’s standing in the international community. He claimed that during the previous ten years, the nation has advanced. The current administration has had a significant role in the nation’s standing in the international arena. The electorate ought to consider who is advancing our nation and make their decision on that.”

Ram Temple and Election Dynamics

When asked whether Ram Temple will be an issue in the elections? Syed Zainul Abedin said that “Ram temple can be an issue, but it cannot be linked to elections. Ram temple was built only after the decision of the Supreme Court. There is no need to take credit in this. The public understands this. When the Supreme Court has given its decision, there is no point in getting hurt by it.”

Exit mobile version