Following what was the final parliamentary debate on the issue, the controversial and ground-breaking Online Safety Bill was passed by the British government today.
Around 300 pages of broad legislation make up the measure, which the United Kingdom claims would make it “the safest place in the world to be online.” In other words, social media corporations will now be held accountable for anything posted on their sites under British law. The corporations’ adherence to the regulations would be monitored by the British telecom regulatory body, Ofcom.
Politicians in the United States have been attempting to enact legislation that would require the businesses to implement rigorous age restrictions and age-checking procedures on their platforms. In Britain, Ofcom will evaluate whether tech companies removed content that it deems harmful and whether they did so quickly enough or by taking steps to stop it from “appearing in the first place.”
Clear and accessible ways to report problems online
This will cover contents that encourages self-harm as well as anything that the regulator claims may be interpreted as hate speech or harassment. The businesses must guarantee that parents have the necessary resources to shield their children from such hazardous content as well as that there are “clear and accessible ways to report problems online when they do arise.” Additionally, the companies will be required to publish routine safety reports and risk evaluations.
“I am immensely proud of what we have achieved with this bill,” said the country’s technology secretary, Michelle Donelan. “Our common-sense approach will deliver a better future for British people by making sure that what is illegal offline is illegal online. It puts protecting children first, enabling us to catch keyboard criminals and crack down on the heinous crimes they seek to commit.”
If social media companies violate the law, they risk paying a fine of up to 10% of their global turnover ($22.3 million) or £18 million ($22.3 million), which may total more than $1 billion. Additionally, the law makes it simpler for the government to file charges against those who distribute illegal or damaging content as well as those who engage in online fraud.
Social media corporations based in the US have expressed worry
Social media corporations based in the US have expressed worry. The messaging applications WhatsApp and Signal, both owned by Meta Platforms Inc., claimed that the Online Safety Bill endangered end-to-end encryption and would result in a “unprecedented regime of mass surveillance.”
The Wikimedia Foundation, which runs the website that houses Wikipedia, admitted the issue and declared it will not implement age verification measures.
Privacy advocates claim that the bill is more about authoritarian surveillance than it is about protecting children, ushering in a new Orwellian world. No one would argue that reducing scams, sexualized material featuring children, or videos of violence against people or animals is a good thing. However, detractors claim that broad legislation that effectively allows the government to scan every private message is unwelcome mass surveillance.
American Electronic Frontier Foundation
Additionally, it has been noted that the word “harmful” is ambiguous, which critics claim will inevitably lead to governments suppressing material that perhaps shouldn’t be. Just that was expressed by the American Electronic Frontier Foundation, or EFF, which said today that the bill will result in “politicised censorship decisions.”
“It’s a basic human right to have a private conversation,” added EFF. “This right is even more important for the most vulnerable people. If the U.K. uses its new powers to scan people’s data, lawmakers will damage the security people need to protect themselves from harassers, data thieves, authoritarian governments, and others.” It claimed that age-verification protocols would put an end to anonymous discourse, putting government critics in danger.
Ofcom has stated that it will gradually change how it regulates these corporations now that the bill is law. One thing is absolutely certain: the internet in Britain will soon appear and operate radically differently.
Also Read: ABC sends Chandrababu Naidu to 14-day judicial remand in corruption case
Keep watching our YouTube Channel ‘DNP INDIA’. Also, please subscribe and follow us on FACEBOOK